After finishing second during the regular season, the RailHawks didn't really catch a break with the seventh-seeded team as their quarterfinal opponent -- Vancouver.
In fact, despite being the highest seed in the quarterfinals, the RailHawks got arguably the worst draw of any team. The difficulty in the opponent is not the quality of the team, because all seven teams in the playoff field are strong sides. The trouble is with the travel that comes with facing the Whitecaps.
No one will log more miles in the quarterfinals than the RailHawks.
Carolina left for Vancouver on Tuesday, will play Thursday, travel back to Cary on Friday and play the Whitecaps again on Sunday. Given that the RailHawks had the choice when to play at home, you might wonder why Martin Rennie didn't choose to play at WakeMed Soccer Park first, which would have forced Vancouver to travel across the country twice instead of Carolina doing it twice.
“I just think it’s always better to have your second game at home," Rennie said. " At that point, you know exactly what you’re doing, and we’ve got a lot of reasons to be confident. Away from home, we’ve done well as well, five wins and five ties on the road is good. We’ve been playing well and we're hard to beat on the road."
Indeed, the RailHawks faired quite well on the road. Their 20 away points were fourth-most in the league, and they managed a 0-0 draw at Vancouver earlier this season. At home, the RailHawks went 11-2-2, and their 35 points earned were second only to Puerto Rico's 36.
Another benefit of playing the return leg at home is if the teams are tied on aggregate after 180 minutes, they go to overtime and then penalty kicks if it's tied after extra time. In a tense situation like that, you're bound to be more comfortable at home. Regardless of the result in the first leg, you're going to feel infinitely more confident about winning the series where you're most comfortable.
Rennie also pointed out that the other two high seeds chose to hit the road first (No. 3 Puerto Rico at No. 6 Rochester, No. 4 Charleston at No. 5 Montreal).
And the travel may not mean anything anyway.
In 2007, Seattle came to Cary and beat the RailHawks in the opening leg 1-0, then downed them 2-0 in the return leg three days later. In the second round, they went to Puerto Rico first, won 2-1. In the return leg at Seattle, Puerto Rico evened the aggregate (3-3), but the Sounders prevailed 4-2 in a shootout. The Sounders went on to win the championship.
Last season, third-seeded Montreal traveled to Seattle first and lost 2-1. The Impact returned to Saputo Stadium two days later and won 3-1 to advance 4-3 on aggregate. In the semifinals, Vancouver went to Montreal first, lost 1-0, went back to Vancouver two days later and won 2-0 to advance 2-1 on aggregate. The Whitecaps went on to win the championship.
So, if you're Martin Rennie, what would you do?